Discussion:
r36200 - lyx-devel/trunk
(too old to reply)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
2010-11-07 21:20:51 UTC
Permalink
Author: switt
Date: Sun Nov 7 22:08:23 2010
New Revision: 36200
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36200
we now require gettext version 0.18 at least
Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
this version as included gettext.

JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
2010-11-13 21:30:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
this version as included gettext.
It's the requirement for gettext tools, AFAIK.
Otherwise the build stops because of bugs in the tools.
My work-around was denied with the argument "encourage people to update".
Do you remember? ;-)
Sorry, I remember now. It is not funny to get old, you know!

JMarc
Stephan Witt
2010-11-13 23:07:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Post by Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
this version as included gettext.
It's the requirement for gettext tools, AFAIK.
Otherwise the build stops because of bugs in the tools.
My work-around was denied with the argument "encourage people to update".
Do you remember? ;-)
Sorry, I remember now. It is not funny to get old, you know!
Yes, I know. I've to admit that you're a little bit right, too.
My work-around patch was targeted for 1.6 and 2.0 includes it already.
It was said to make both environments similar... what would you
say?

I think it's weird for a maintainer to have different build environments
for branch and trunk. Now for 1.6 we have higher requirements than for 2.0.

Stephan

Loading...